- From: Kenneth Rohde Christiansen <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 02:24:17 -0800
- To: w3c/manifest <manifest@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 13 December 2017 10:24:38 UTC
I am OK with using purpose instead, that is probably better. Do you feel like trying to write the spec text for this? You are of course free to re-use parts of this PR, if that makes any sense. I understand you point with dead-zone, but I am not sure there is any usefulness in any dead-zone like 1/2 - it just doesn't make practical sense, so it is maybe a bit of an invented/theoretical problem. You can say that 1/3 is because of Oreo, but it is also a very nicely (beautiful?) chosen number. It is not like 2/5 or 6/10 :-) It doesn't feel that arbitrary and I wouldn't be surprised if others would go with something similar like 1/3 or 1/4 - so with 1/3 we should be covered well. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/manifest/pull/563#issuecomment-351348676
Received on Wednesday, 13 December 2017 10:24:38 UTC