- From: Kenneth Rohde Christiansen <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2017 14:16:50 +0000 (UTC)
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 7 December 2017 14:17:22 UTC
There are other reasons to use the Web IDL, it simplifies processing and @mgiuca and @marcoscaceres want to reuse parts in other specs, like Share Target and Web Payments AFAIK. This is really the only problem we have currently, so if we could find a way to spec this difference for the processing that would solve a lot of issues for us right now. I am not opposed to use another solution if we can come up with one, but I do understand the need to reuse similar syntax/objects in other APIs. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/491#issuecomment-349979254
Received on Thursday, 7 December 2017 14:17:22 UTC