- From: Thomas Steiner <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2017 12:51:08 +0000 (UTC)
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 7 December 2017 12:51:31 UTC
Thanks, @gauntface! Any further thoughts from the [Workbox](https://developers.google.com/web/tools/workbox/) team or others in general? Should I fork this (*this* being a ```Cache.has(request, {options}))``` method that returns a ```CacheItem``` object) out into its own Issue, @jakearchibald? Please advise. Merci! -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/863#issuecomment-349958050
Received on Thursday, 7 December 2017 12:51:31 UTC