Re: [heycam/webidl] Considering factoring WebIDL to allow use from the ECMAScript specification (#486)

@littledan said:
> Maybe we could mark things as "level 1"/"level 2" within the same document, and ECMAScript can depend on the "level 1" stuff?

Oh, let's not create yet more semantics for levels. :D

@annevk said:
> I'd probably go with "Core" and "Extended" or some such, but yeah, that could work.

Maybe we should just spell out the layering and see what it would look like, e.g.:

```
       Infra
          |
        IDL (core)
          |
        ES6
          |
IDL (extended)   <—>  HTML
          |
  Web specs
```

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/486#issuecomment-349598624