[heycam/webidl] Consider semantic changes to WebIDL to make suitable for ECMAScript (#484)

If we were going to use WebIDL for the ECMAScript specification, we'd need a few more features, such as:
- Non-enumerable methods
- (possibly) declarations of own properties
- ... (there is probably more; I will come back to edit this issue to fill more in)

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/484