Re: [heycam/webidl] Add [LegacyNamespace] to allow defining an interface in a namespace (#425) from Anne van Kesteren on 2017-08-30 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from August 2017)

From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 09:55:58 -0700
To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <heycam/webidl/pull/425/c326053158@github.com>

As far as I know the differences are fairly minor: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/226. But they are a source of annoyance. I still wonder whether we should offer some kind of opt-in mechanism to get JavaScript-style classes rather than IDL-style classes. Then we could also potentially describe other things with IDL, such as Promise and ReadableStream, if we wanted to.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/pull/425#issuecomment-326053158

Received on Wednesday, 30 August 2017 16:56:20 UTC