Re: [heycam/webidl] Add [LegacyNamespace] to allow defining an interface in a namespace (#425)

That said, are we sure that the backwards compatibility issues that will be created by moving to a WebIDL-based specification aren't the occasion to eschew [LegacyNamespace] altogether and move to the more standard `NamespaceInterface` format seen elsewhere?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/pull/425#issuecomment-326046456

Received on Wednesday, 30 August 2017 16:32:40 UTC