Re: [heycam/webidl] Add [LegacyNamespace] to allow defining an interface in a namespace (#425)

Just discussed this with @bzbarsky. He pointed out that Mozilla's Wasm implementation wasn't relying on WebIDL at all so far, which creates significant differences with what a WebIDL-based implementation would look like. Is Chrome's implementation WebIDL-based? @lukewagner, what's Mozilla's plan here? Are implementations going to converge on a WebIDL-based spec?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/pull/425#issuecomment-326037746