Re: [heycam/webidl] Add [InNamespace] to allow defining an interface in a namespace (#425)

My thinking for advising @littledan to go with this instead of new syntax is that we already use extended attributes to control what gets exposed for a given interface (viz. [NamedConstructor], [NoInterfaceObject], and [Exposed]). Plus, it's always a bonus when we don't need to update every IDL toolchain to add a new feature.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/pull/425#issuecomment-324790583