- From: Peter Rushforth <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 00:04:31 +0000 (UTC)
- To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 25 August 2017 00:04:57 UTC
That is a fair comment regarding standardizing something that doesn't have consensus. OTOH, that is why polyfills exist, and if you look at caniuse.com I think it is clear there are many many things which will never be implemented by all browsers. I guess my concern is that no vendor appears to be working on either a native implementation or a polyfill even, and even when the polyfill is available from the community, the flagship library promoting Custom Elements won't accept the PR. Finally, the reasons that a vendor gives for not implementing a feature are often not clearly articulated to the community. In the case of customised built ins, we heard something about liskov substitution principle; with imports it was wait and see how modules turn out. Never any specifics, and certainly not done in public, like for example discourse.wicg.io/ -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/648#issuecomment-324789470
Received on Friday, 25 August 2017 00:04:57 UTC