- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 11:15:04 -0700
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 24 August 2017 18:15:25 UTC
I expect it'd actually be easier to implement recursive semantics since then you could reuse the code already in place for `<script type=module>`. It'd certainly be easier to spec. Regardless, recursive semantics vs. not are a tiny, tiny detail in the overall tapestry of problems with naively integrating `<link rel=preload>`. Please see the summary at https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/486#issuecomment-282044172 . Those are the real problems here, and it's not perfect vs. good, it's working at all vs. being completely broken. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/486#issuecomment-324714666
Received on Thursday, 24 August 2017 18:15:25 UTC