- From: Ben Kelly <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 14:53:59 +0000 (UTC)
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 21 August 2017 14:54:26 UTC
Errr... my last comment makes no sense because `updateViaCache` is on the registration, not the worker. I think changing the `updateViaCache` property is analogous to changing the `scriptURL`. The problem is we put `updateViaCache` on the registration instead of the worker itself. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1189#issuecomment-323764662
Received on Monday, 21 August 2017 14:54:26 UTC