- From: Peter Beverloo <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 14:50:16 +0000 (UTC)
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 21 August 2017 14:50:39 UTC
In some situations `[SecureContext]` is implied through an object's exposure. Concretely, interfaces only exposed in Service Workers are per definition limited to secure contexts because Service Workers themselves are. Should we still specify `[SecureContext]` on such interfaces? It's clear, but redundant. This came up in https://github.com/w3c/push-api/pull/284 for the `PushEvent` and `PushSubscriptionChangeEvent` interfaces. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/420
Received on Monday, 21 August 2017 14:50:39 UTC