Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] API to enumerate databases (#31)

> it seems over-designed to make too much guarantee for the consistency by returning all IDBDatabase objects.

Since the IDBDatabase objects were going to be closed, they were basically just going to be dumb data containers anyways.

If there's some objection in making it an IDBDatabase object, would could/should do the IDBDatabaseInfo thing, even if only to contain the database name for now.

That will make the data contained easily expandable in the future.

And from this implementors standpoint, we literally already have an internal IDBDatabaseInfo object that could easily be exposed to the DOM. :)


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/issues/31#issuecomment-323758688