- From: Mike West <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 13:10:00 +0000 (UTC)
- To: whatwg/url <url@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 16 August 2017 13:10:22 UTC
> We don't have special processing for `blob:` either, yet that is used. We do have special processing for `blob:` in URL, both in parsing and in mapping the URL to an origin. Moreover, blobs are in active use with semantics interoperably implemented by user agents. They're a little different than `gopher:`. :) > If I have a JavaScript application that parses URLs or implements Gopher suddenly gopher:///test/ would end up parsing differently and perhaps break things. It's probably okay, but not great. I think that the changes to the `gopher:` test results in https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/tree/master/url would cause some churn. I'd be pretty surprised if that churn broke any applications, because I'd be surprised if `gopher:` was in anything resembling wide use. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/url/issues/342#issuecomment-322765632
Received on Wednesday, 16 August 2017 13:10:22 UTC