Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review request for Server-Timing (#188)

It would perhaps be useful to see an explainer document here, to answer questions such as why a new specification is needed here rather than reusing existing mechanisms.  (My guess at the answer to that particular question is so that timing information for all the resources that are used by the document, no matter what type of resources they are, can be included easily in the timeline.)

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/188#issuecomment-322508811

Received on Tuesday, 15 August 2017 15:56:22 UTC