- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 06:33:48 -0700
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Saturday, 29 April 2017 13:34:21 UTC
> Is JavaScript now aligned with implementations on ArrayBuffer around this? I believe some folks still tried to make them throw for more things. No. I thought we'd best remove any aspirational stuff at least for now, especially given the inconsistency. > Also note that for the APIs you tested browsers might not use IDL's copying infrastructure since that's not the option that yields the best performance. It's independent of the copy/reference; it should occur whenever converting a buffer source type to IDL, which happens before any algorithm steps. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/352#issuecomment-298169306
Received on Saturday, 29 April 2017 13:34:21 UTC