Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] WebVR (#106)

Brought up in Tokyo F2F.

We took a second look at this. It seems like the focus of the work has been shifted to 2.0 (whereas our review above was on 1.x) which presumably is in heavy development. We would be extremely interested in having a architectural decisions (and figure out dependencies and upstreaming work to dependent platform specs) - would the group be interested in this?

@toji @RafaelCintron (feel free to add others into the loop)

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/106#issuecomment-298153017

Received on Saturday, 29 April 2017 07:29:03 UTC