Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Long Task API (#150)

Hey @spanicker,

Thanks for filing this and working with us! We read the spec at the F2F meeting in Tokyo and are happy with the shape of the API. @torgo's note about the lack of precision was part of a conversation discussing the design constraints. Overall, we're happy with how this has turned out and want to see it move forward.

Consider this a "clean bill of health" on the design, although we would note that a spec like this should have an explainer which outlines the problems it solves and shows example code for how the issues are addressed by the design. This will continue to be important as you look towards V2. 

Thanks for looking into that and bringing us into your design process.

Regards

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/150#issuecomment-297624126