- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 05:24:05 -0700
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 25 April 2017 12:24:37 UTC
annevk commented on this pull request.
Found a couple of nits and a question about the overall structure of this algorithm.
>
- <li><p>Increase <var>body</var>'s <a for=body>transmitted bytes</a> by <var>bytes</var>'s
- length.
+ <p class="note no-backref">This substep blocks until entire <var>bs</var> is transmitted.
<li><p>Run the above step again.
Which step does this refer to?
> @@ -1187,16 +1187,19 @@ or "<code>worker</code>".
<li>
<p>When <var>read</var> is fulfilled with an object whose <code>done</code>
property is false and whose <code>value</code> property is a
- <code>Uint8Array</code> object, run these substeps:
+ <code>Uint8Array</code> object, run these substeps <a>in parallel</a>:
Can we use "steps" here rather than "substeps"?
>
- <li><p>Increase <var>body</var>'s <a for=body>transmitted bytes</a> by <var>bytes</var>'s
- length.
+ <p class="note no-backref">This substep blocks until entire <var>bs</var> is transmitted.
s/entire bs is/bs is fully/
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/532#pullrequestreview-34546549
Received on Tuesday, 25 April 2017 12:24:37 UTC