Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Secure context language is redundant/contradicts secure context spec (#1125)

> A user agent may allow localhost, 127.0.0.0/8, and ::1/128 for development purpose. (Note that they may still be secure contexts.)

I agree to remove it and rely on the Secure Contexts spec but still want to provide information to devs that they can use loopback addresses, etc. Would leaving the following note make sense?

> Note: Developers can use 127.0.0.0/8, ::1/128, and localhost (see [the requirements](https://w3c.github.io/webappsec-secure-contexts/#localhost)) for development purpose.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1125#issuecomment-296570179