- From: Peter Beverloo <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 11:15:05 -0700
- To: w3c/push-api <push-api@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 21 April 2017 18:16:02 UTC
What remains are nine warnings about missing definitions in the *Init dictionaries, which would be either duplicate or refer to the definitions of the identically named properties in the interfaces. I don't think it's a fantastic idea to do either. @marcoscaceres would you know what the idiomatic way of dealing with those warnings is? A few examples: * ``No <dfn> for userVisibleOnly in PushSubscriptionOptionsInit. Please define it and link to spec that declares it. See https://github.com/w3c/respec/wiki/data--cite`` * ``No <dfn> for data in PushEventInit. Please define it and link to spec that declares it. See https://github.com/w3c/respec/wiki/data--cite`` You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/w3c/push-api/pull/253 -- Commit Summary -- * Fix a series of warnings in the specification -- File Changes -- M index.html (88) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/w3c/push-api/pull/253.patch https://github.com/w3c/push-api/pull/253.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/push-api/pull/253
Received on Friday, 21 April 2017 18:16:02 UTC