Thank you for the clarification, @wanderview
In that case, the spec says:
>> A ServiceWorkerGlobalScope object represents the global execution context of a service worker. A ServiceWorkerGlobalScope object has an associated service worker (a service worker).
So, I'm happy with `self.serviceWorker` and `self.client` or `self.thisServiceWorker` and `self.thisClient` (sounds weird) or, following spec terminology, `self.associatedServiceWorker` (sounds even weirder) and `self.associatedClient`.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1077#issuecomment-296160636