- From: Takeshi Yoshino <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 21:24:59 -0700
- To: whatwg/streams <streams@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 20 April 2017 04:26:02 UTC
> I'm curious if this is the best solution. At first I tried to move the code into ReadableStreamClose, since ReadableStreamError has a branch on reader type and I thought ReadableStreamClose should be symmetric. But that caused failing tests, as I believe we want to keep the byobRequest around even if the stream gets closed. So this version seemed OK-ish. Right, though we might want to revisit necessity of this feature given the complexity. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/streams/pull/698#issuecomment-295576449
Received on Thursday, 20 April 2017 04:26:02 UTC