Re: [whatwg/streams] Do not assume a BYOB reader when fulfilling a BYOB request (#698)

> I'm curious if this is the best solution. At first I tried to move the code into ReadableStreamClose, since ReadableStreamError has a branch on reader type and I thought ReadableStreamClose should be symmetric. But that caused failing tests, as I believe we want to keep the byobRequest around even if the stream gets closed. So this version seemed OK-ish.

Right, though we might want to revisit necessity of this feature given the complexity.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/streams/pull/698#issuecomment-295576449

Received on Thursday, 20 April 2017 04:26:02 UTC