- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 08:10:40 -0700
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 19 April 2017 15:11:15 UTC
I think the idea is that you stop using StructuredCloneWithTransfer() entirely, and instead use separate StructuredSerializeWithTransfer/StructuredDeserializeWithTransfer steps. Maybe I can work that out in a new PR. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1126#issuecomment-295304065
Received on Wednesday, 19 April 2017 15:11:15 UTC