Re: [whatwg/streams] Calling sink.abort() after a sink method rejection could lead to double cleanup (#735)

I agree with your feeling. I think in general without finally(), double-cleanup or not-enough-cleanup is a hazard with the current API, and you need to write code resilient to that. I guess we should prioritize finally() a decent bit.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/735#issuecomment-294614648