- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 13:14:44 -0700
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 17 April 2017 20:16:23 UTC
Re: [Default] vs. [DefaultToJSON]. I do not have strong opinions, and agree with your overview of the possible pros. I am just skeptical that we will ever use the generality. So I'm happy to leave it up to you; of course if @bzbarsky or anyone else has stronger opinions that would be good to hear. BTW I am quite happy with the extended attribute approach these days; notably it fits with other cases where we use extended attributes to "generate" the definition of the operation/attribute, like [PutForwards]. Re: overall strategy. I think going straight to the backing data is the better way to go. It matches the current spec (see e.g. https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/188#issuecomment-271441063 discussion) and thus will result in no extra implementation churn. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/pull/323#issuecomment-294578435
Received on Monday, 17 April 2017 20:16:23 UTC