- From: Jungkee Song <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 01:05:44 -0700
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 10 April 2017 08:06:18 UTC
Right. I think we should move this step to the task to be queued (i.e to step 6.7.1.) One check point is whether we need this guard in the first place. Doesn't [navigate](https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#navigate) algorithm validate all the pre-navigate conditions itself? @jakearchibald, could you check if you needed this for some specific reason? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1108#issuecomment-292878094
Received on Monday, 10 April 2017 08:06:18 UTC