Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting a fetch: The Next Generation (#447)

re: readyState 3, the assumption that I made when I wrote [the events in my proposal](https://github.com/stuartpb/FetchController-spec#fetchobserver-events) was that the transition to readyState 3 would correspond to the first `progress` event after reaching readyState 2, which is why I didn't include a specific state for it (it's just "the first progress event within the post-headers state", and XHR making that a *separate* state was just one of those weird vestigial details from XHR's original implementation-oriented interface).

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/447#issuecomment-292790675