- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2017 20:14:07 -0700
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Sunday, 9 April 2017 03:14:40 UTC
> Is that an inconsistency in behavior that we should fix? I think we could go either way. It's very common for HTML to have an invalid value default for enumerated attributes; I can't think of any that fall back to an error behavior. But I'm not sure about HTTP link parameters. Maybe @mnot can lend us his HTTP knowledge. Re-stating things: I think an inconsistency is fine if each behavior makes sense within its own domain (HTML vs. HTTP). -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1110#issuecomment-292760780
Received on Sunday, 9 April 2017 03:14:40 UTC