Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] service worker client definition is redundant (#1046)

@jungkees we credit isonmad as "isonmad" in various WHATWG standards. I think that's their preference.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1046#issuecomment-292514684

Received on Friday, 7 April 2017 11:39:35 UTC