- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2017 07:34:52 -0700
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 6 April 2017 14:35:26 UTC
domenic commented on this pull request. > @@ -1419,6 +1419,103 @@ that gave folks all the wrong ideas. <a>Events</a> do not represent or cause act can only be used to influence an ongoing one. +<h3 id=controlling-promises>Controlling {{Promise}}s</h3> + +Though {{Promise}} objects don't have any built-in cancellation mechanism, many {{Promise}}-vending +APIs require cancellation semantics. {{PromiseController}} is meant to support these requirements by +providing an {{PromiseController/abort()}} method that toggles the state of a corresponding +{{PromiseSignal}} object. The API which wishes to support cancellation can accept such a +{{PromiseSignal}}, and use its state to determine how (not) to proceed. + +Upon {{PromiseController/abort()}}, the relevant {{Promise}} will reject with an +<dfn exception>AbortError</dfn> [=simple exception=]. But also I'm not sure if avoiding DOMException is worthwhile since we already have a dependency on EventTarget. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/pull/434#discussion_r110177874
Received on Thursday, 6 April 2017 14:35:26 UTC