Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] Review request for Feature Policy (#159)

Thanks, @dbaron -- I'll see about cleaning that section up. It's getting a bit dated now, and it certainly would be good to make the intentions clearer, especially wrt. sandbox attributes.

@mikewest or @ojanvafai can probably also comment on this, but I think that the eventual goal is to implement most of the sandbox attributes as policy-controlled features (possibly leaving them in sandbox for compatibility, but essentially being syntactic sugar for the same thing)

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/spec-reviews/issues/159#issuecomment-291975710