- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2017 17:24:01 -0700
- To: w3ctag/spec-reviews <spec-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 4 April 2017 00:24:34 UTC
> Bit of an API mis-alignment: [...] then it should call updateWith() and provide a PaymentDetailsUpdate dictionary, or a promise for one, containing changed values that [...] yet the API signature for updateWith requires a Promise with no option for just passing a PaymentDetailsUpdate dictionary. That's how `Promise<PaymentDetailsUpdate>` is defined in Web IDL, to accept both; the spec is correct as-is. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/spec-reviews/issues/152#issuecomment-291339572
Received on Tuesday, 4 April 2017 00:24:34 UTC