Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] service worker client definition is redundant (#1046)

Just discussed with @domenic in the f2f. We agreed what @isonmad suggested in the above comment. I'll try to update the spec by using the base type with the most-specialized-to-most-general-types language.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1046#issuecomment-291044354

Received on Monday, 3 April 2017 04:04:39 UTC