Re: [w3c/pointerlock] pointerlockchange is cancelable, breaking the processing model (#9) from Anne van Kesteren on 2016-09-30 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from September 2016)

From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 23:34:23 -0700
To: w3c/pointerlock <pointerlock@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <w3c/pointerlock/issues/9/250670271@github.com>

@scheib FWIW, I think that'd be a bad change. We don't define those kind of things for other events either. And just adding boilerplate everywhere doesn't seem like an improvement.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/pointerlock/issues/9#issuecomment-250670271

Received on Friday, 30 September 2016 06:35:01 UTC