- From: Eero Häkkinen <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 07:48:17 -0700
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <whatwg/fetch/issues/392@github.com>
The Body package data algorithm with bytes, FormData and multipart/form-data MIME type step 1 says > Parse bytes, using the value of the `boundary` parameter from MIME type and utf-8 as encoding, per the rules set forth in Returning Values from Forms: multipart/form-data. [RFC2388] That is not very detailed parsing specification. While implementing the algorithm for Chromium, I ran into interpretation issues. My main question is how to parse different kind of multipart parts. Parts whose Content-Disposition header field contains a filename parameter must surely be parsed into **Blob**s. That is what Mozilla does. What about multipart parts which have a Content-Type header field but whose Content-Disposition header field does not contain a filename parameter? To my understanding, it is not possible to construct such parts with **FormData** because **USVString**s will never generate a Content-Type header field and **Blob**s have a default file name ("blob"). Should these parts be parsed into **Blob**s in spite of the missing filename parameter? Should a multipart part with a name "_charset_" have no effect on decoding encoding? I think that probably yes, because RFC2388 does not even describe that name (but RFC7578 does) and because the body package data algorithm with bytes, FormData and application/x-www-form-urlencoded MIME type runs the application/x-www-form-urlencoded parser steps with a use_charset_flag implicitly unset thus it does not change decoding encoding based on the "_charset_" component. If string parts can never have a Content-Type header field, they can never have a charset parameter either. The multipart part with a name "_charset_" does not seem to have an effect on decoding, either. Does it thus follow that string parts must always be decoded using utf-8 encoding? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/392
Received on Thursday, 29 September 2016 14:48:48 UTC