Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] A spec style/structure checklist? (#136)

> On Sep 26, 2016, at 2:28 , Marcos Cáceres <notifications@github.com> wrote:
> 
> Also, the AB is concerned that the /TR page is an un-navigable list (‘graveyard’ has been used). Templates or other work that help classify specs (some semantic tagging) might help.
> 
> Could you kindly clarify what you mean by "semantic tagging"? 
> 
> 

I think there was an effort once to include keywords, RDFa and so on, to enable classification of specs.  The TR page is an undifferentiated list of specs; I have a vague dream that one might be able to find (for example) all specs that talked about being an HTML extension, or about styling, or the DOM, and so on.  It’s very vague.

We don’t do well at helping developers find stuff right now, and I am waffling about tagging as a possible way to help.

David Singer
Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.



-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/spec-reviews/issues/136#issuecomment-249653226