- From: Matt Falkenhagen <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 21:41:49 -0700
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 26 September 2016 04:42:19 UTC
I think it's OK to call this an implementation detail. I was originally thinking the spec gives room to terminate long-running events, whereas this is a bit different: the browser sees "postMessage" and decides to not postMessage. But you could consider this being the browser terminating the worker just before/during the postMessage call, so it fits under the spec language of termination "at any time". Jake's is an interesting idea. I may use something like that for the implementation. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/980#issuecomment-249478147
Received on Monday, 26 September 2016 04:42:19 UTC