[w3c/IndexedDB] Async LocalStorage (transactionless key-value API over IDB) (#91)

This is a thing that webdevs perennially ask for, mostly because of ergonomics.

Would such an API also have any performance benefits due to the lack of transaction overhead? Is there overhead? Would this be a moot point because it would have to live alongside transaction-ful code anyway?

See also:
- https://discourse.wicg.io/t/asynclocalstorage/1554/9
- https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/906
- [localForage](https://github.com/mozilla/localforage)
- [idb-keyval](https://github.com/jakearchibald/idb-keyval)
- ["just give us leveldb in the browser"](https://twitter.com/substack/status/577768318502707200)

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/issues/91