- From: Joseph Orbegoso Pea <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 12:07:57 -0700
- To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 21 September 2016 19:08:52 UTC
So I think requiring `observedAttributes` to be an array -- possibly containing RegExp instances -- would make assumptions easier. Then the pattern can just always be `return super.observedAttributes().concat(...)`. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/565#issuecomment-248711615
Received on Wednesday, 21 September 2016 19:08:52 UTC