Re: [heycam/webidl] Does a non-nullable and non-required dictionary member of interface type make sense? (#176)

>From "no type coercion can be applied" I wonder if you overlooked that `control` is already nullable? The question is if it would have been better if non-nullable?

I'd argue that making these things nullable will always be harmless, consistent with everything that already exists, and help catch mistakes where it wasn't intentional.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/176#issuecomment-248421455