Re: [heycam/webidl] Does a non-nullable and non-required dictionary member of interface type make sense? (#176)

I guess this is one of those "be consistent with the old, slightly bad thing" vs. "be inconsistent and adopt the better thing". There are a lot of old dictionaries that use nullable, whereas it would be nicer if undefined was the only defaulter on the platform. (For consistency with ES, and with optional arguments, among others.)

I'm inclined to say that going forward we should not use nullable in this way, but I could be persuaded to be consistent with the old, slightly bad thing.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/176#issuecomment-248261829