- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 06:18:04 -0700
- To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 19 September 2016 13:18:38 UTC
There are two possibilities: 1. keep using the sync flag, try/catch the exception, report it, and return HTMLUnknownElement like the parser does 2. use upgrade-like semantics and [CEReactions] The observable differences here are subtle and minimal. (1) will return HTMLUnknownElement; (2) will return HTMLElement. And then there's the subtle constructor-vs.-upgrade issues, mostly around error cases. I don't have a strong preference. I think @rniwa was leaning toward (1). It would be good for someone (probably me, maybe I can get @dominiccooney to do it) to enumerate all the differences in more depth, just to be sure there isn't a clear winner hiding there. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/569#issuecomment-247990232
Received on Monday, 19 September 2016 13:18:38 UTC