Re: [w3c/gamepad] Added a supplemental "Extensions" spec (#32)

I think I'm pretty good with that. Can we perhaps even further scaled back for the immediate moment and start with just:

``` javascript
enum GamepadHapticActuatorType {
  "vibration",
};

interface GamepadHapticActuator {
  readonly attribute GamepadHapticActuatorType type;
  Promise<void> pulse(double value, double duration);
};
```

And work up from there? I like the buffered playback idea but it's a fair amount of extra complexity and probably warrants further discussion. In the meantime I'd really *really* like to get this spec published and linkable quickly. Fortunately the way you have the API segmented means that it can be added in later without any compatibility issues.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/gamepad/pull/32#issuecomment-247495678

Received on Friday, 16 September 2016 01:08:53 UTC