- From: Tony Jin <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 12:34:21 -0700
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 15 September 2016 19:35:11 UTC
Also not sure how this all goes together, but I noticed the following two don't match: https://www.w3.org/TR/cors/#access-control-allow-headers-response-header https://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#http-new-header-syntax Specifically: Access-Control-Allow-Headers: "Access-Control-Allow-Headers" ":" #field-name (in W3) Access-Control-Allow-Headers = #field-name-or-wildcard (in Fetch Spec) As I was writing this I realized the W3 recommendation was published in Jan 2014, so I guess we'll have to wait for a newer version to be published? Does the latest fetch spec's definition of Access-Control-Allow-Headers supersede the W3 recommendation? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/298#issuecomment-247428907
Received on Thursday, 15 September 2016 19:35:11 UTC