- From: Hayato Ito <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 00:09:47 -0700
- To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 14 September 2016 07:10:16 UTC
Thanks! Then, I propose that `<slot>` should not be a replaced element, unless there is an objection. Regarding the current behavior in Blink, please do not take it seriously. No explicit intention there. The current support of `<slot>` in Blink is incomplete because Blink does not support "slot" in a flat tree. See https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/308 for details. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/564#issuecomment-246925446
Received on Wednesday, 14 September 2016 07:10:16 UTC