- From: Marcos Cáceres <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2016 21:19:39 -0700
- To: w3c/manifest <manifest@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3c/manifest/pull/493/r78314037@github.com>
> + <li>Let <var>value</var> be the result of calling the > + <a>[[\GetOwnProperty]]</a> internal method of <var>image</var> > + passing " <code>purpose</code>" as the argument. > + </li> > + <li>Let <var>type</var> be <a>Type</a>(<var>value</var>). > + </li> > + <li>If <var>type</var> is not "string", then: > + <ol> > + <li>If <var>type</var> is not "<code>undefined</code>", <a>issue > + a developer warning</a> that the type is unsupported. > + </li> > + <li>Return <code>undefined</code>. > + </li> > + </ol> > + </li> > + <li>Let <var>keywords</var> be the result of <a>splitting</a> I gave this more thought, and I think I want to stick with a string here - because it's rare that something will have multiple purpose (and we only define one purpose). Should probably only use arrays for complex types. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/manifest/pull/493/files/c33d8ca424da40f2d7144c5cdfac6f7ba35ed689#r78314037
Received on Monday, 12 September 2016 04:20:08 UTC