Re: [w3c/permissions] fix(request): clarify how requests affect state (#127)

> @@ -305,10 +305,9 @@ spec: webidl
>          </li>
>          <li>
>            If the user grants permission, return {{"granted"}}; otherwise return
> -          {{"denied"}}. If the user's interaction indicates they intend this
> -          choice to apply to other realms, then treat this as <a>new information
> -          about the user's intent</a> for other <a>realms</a> with the <a>same
> -          origin</a>.
> +          {{"denied"}}. The user's interaction may provide <a>new information
> +          about the user's intent</a> for this <a>realm</a> and other
> +          <a>realms</a> with the <a>same origin</a>.

Is the implication that this prohibits this from providing new information for other origins?  Because it might be read that way.  I would have thought that saying "NO WAY!" to a prompt on `https://google.com` might reasonably be interpreted as a rejection for (for example) `http://google.com`, and even other ports on the same host.  That's something that I believe we do for some permissions in Firefox.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/permissions/pull/127/files/922d405c32172faaeb39a95c893f5b607e6f85b0#r78135847