Re: [whatwg/dom] Editorial: resolve all novel bikeshed "link errors" (#361)

Yes, if you want future-proof turn on `Assume Explicit For` in your spec; then a missing `for` on an autolink is assumed to mean `for=/`, so you have to be explicit with every non-/ `for`.  You have to write more `for` values, but nothing can change under you.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/dom/pull/361#issuecomment-257419281